2004-05-02
ECONOMIC TREASON
WILL BRADY'S GALLERY
economic treason | And act concerning the breach of public trust by managers of monies and resources who have taken, used and spent so as to personally profit from those resources at the expense of the true owners of the same -namely, the citizenry and/or shareholders
v The premise is simple. When certain individuals or parties conduct themselves in such a way as to jeopardize the economic and social well being of the community and have done so while personally benefitting simultaneous to the detriment of those who entrusted them with the proper management of certain resources, they have "endangered the life of the polity" and, as a result, may have committed Economic Treason
v Include that they be held accounatble for their actions, and be required to repay society for effects of those actions accordingly
v When decision-makers, representatives of the polity, if you will, engage to assist those who violate the sacred trust, they too, must be held accountable. But here we must also address what the legal definitions of their involvement might be
v There are precedents in history, however unsavory, for the punishment of such crimes to be meted out against the transgressors
v We don't have to follow these methods if they don't seem fit. Perhaps the penalty of death is not sufficient deterrent. for some, forced remediation and reimbursenet for their crimes -coupled with mandatory privation and public humiliation- for the rest of their life, would be a far more brutal punishment, but not less fitting
v Even, possibly, letting the perpetrators appear to go free, but to be barred from any professional titles, polistions, liscensces or certification or authority; being required to maintain a very publicly known place of residence with not protections nor interventions. Letting forces take their course they shall have to deal with their victims unprotected.
¶ 18:20
WILL BRADY'S GALLERY
economic treason | And act concerning the breach of public trust by managers of monies and resources who have taken, used and spent so as to personally profit from those resources at the expense of the true owners of the same -namely, the citizenry and/or shareholders
v The premise is simple. When certain individuals or parties conduct themselves in such a way as to jeopardize the economic and social well being of the community and have done so while personally benefitting simultaneous to the detriment of those who entrusted them with the proper management of certain resources, they have "endangered the life of the polity" and, as a result, may have committed Economic Treason
v Include that they be held accounatble for their actions, and be required to repay society for effects of those actions accordingly
v When decision-makers, representatives of the polity, if you will, engage to assist those who violate the sacred trust, they too, must be held accountable. But here we must also address what the legal definitions of their involvement might be
v There are precedents in history, however unsavory, for the punishment of such crimes to be meted out against the transgressors
v We don't have to follow these methods if they don't seem fit. Perhaps the penalty of death is not sufficient deterrent. for some, forced remediation and reimbursenet for their crimes -coupled with mandatory privation and public humiliation- for the rest of their life, would be a far more brutal punishment, but not less fitting
v Even, possibly, letting the perpetrators appear to go free, but to be barred from any professional titles, polistions, liscensces or certification or authority; being required to maintain a very publicly known place of residence with not protections nor interventions. Letting forces take their course they shall have to deal with their victims unprotected.
¶ 18:20
